Dear Folks, Many thanks for the cogent advice. I have been busy since last night - I found a publication from the Copyright Council that sets out what one must do in Australia in regard to photographic copyright - Dave Hornford was spot-on with his notes. In this case there was no commissioning of the photos and no valuable consideration passed at all, so it looks like I am still the owner of the right. As Dave said, the commercial firm may assume that the person presenting the artwork for processing owns the copyright, but I intend to contact them to see if they require evidence of that. I have had a quiet electronic word with the high council of our club and they will likely be able to stop any untoward use - the power of society - but I have made it clear that I do not want to be considered the picture scrooge. I shall continue to supply costume pictures, event coverage, and all sorts of baby pictures as freely as before ( These are my friends, after all, and I get to be in some of the pictures too...) but when the work is taken out into the market place it is a different kettle of lutefisk. A small note from the BGA: Physical violence is rarely used in Guild work, and we do not often resort to normal court procedures, unless the victim does not speak English and can be intimidated by the mechanism of the law. It is often enough to simply turn up at the guilty party's workplace with several children clothed in rags pleading for food to ellicit the required response. Or in severe cases the guilty party may be publicly forgiven by the Guild member for whatever the fault is - every day - every single blessed day - and at exactly the same time..... Uncle Dick ============================================================================================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.