[pure-silver] Re: Contrast grades

  • From: "BOB KISS" <bobkiss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 18:23:17 -0400

DEAR RICHARD,
        An interesting anecdotal note is that Adams, in one of his books,
states that Agfa Brovira #2 is about the same contrast as Kodabromide #3.
He used the "F" (glossy) surfaces but did not ferrotype them.  Perhaps this
is after Agfa changed to the ISO system.
                CHEERS!
                        BOB

-----Original Message-----
From: pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Richard Knoppow
Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2013 1:09 PM
To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Contrast grades


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "BOB KISS" <bobkiss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 1:48 PM
Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Contrast grades


> DEAR MARK,
>
>            Fasten your seatbelt because, when Richard gets 
> home from work,
> he will give you a thorough description of the methods 
> used to determine
> paper contrasts for both graded and VC paper.
>
>            However, in summary, although there are 
> standards of how
> manufacturers are supposed to determine contrast of their 
> papers, the
> reality is that, from manufacturer to manufacturer, there 
> are significant
> variations of the contrast of both graded paper and VC 
> papers for each
> "number" claimed by them.
>
> As long ago as Adam's books, The Print and The Negative, 
> he talked about the
> significant variations of contrast of #2 papers from 
> manufacturer to
> manufacturer.  Recall that his zone system was based on 
> trying to produce a
> neg that print nearly perfectly on a "middle" contrast 
> paper and he aimed
> his process at #2 contrast graded paper.
>
> I pass the scepter to Richard.
>
>                        CHEERS!
>
>                                    BOB
    Well, I thank you for the compliment but I can't add 
much.  Both speed and contrast are covered by ISO standards. 
Kodak used to explain this in their printing handbook and 
paper catalogue. If you can find one used it will give you 
details.  At one time AGFA used a different system for 
indicating contrast. AGFA papers were about one step higher 
in number than Kodak for the same contrast, that is, AGFA 
No.3 was the same as Kodak No.2. However AGFA went to the 
ISO system perhaps thirty years ago.  The existence of some 
AGFA papers with No.6 contrast grade lead some people to 
think they were extra-high contrast when they were the same 
as Kodak No.5.
    The visual contrast of a paper is strongly affected by 
its surface. Only glossy surface can produce the highest 
contrast grades.  The scattering of light from matte 
surfaces reduces both the effective maximum density and the 
brightest highlights. Kodak discusses this in their 
handbook.
    Note also that different types of light sources have a 
significant effect on effective contrast.  The difference 
between a diffusion source and the common semi-diffusing 
condenser source (large, diffuse lamp and condenser) is 
about one paper grade and the difference can generally be 
exactly compensated by changing either paper grade or 
negative contrast.  True point source lamps have much higher 
contrast and often can not be exactly compensated. However, 
they are rare.
    Another factor in visual contrast is the paper surface. 
Again Kodak discusses this in their paper handbooks. Maximum 
density range and hence maximum contrast can be obtained 
only with a glossy surface paper. The scattering from matte 
surfaces reduces both visual density and visual brightness.


--
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles
WB6KBL
dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx


============================================================================
=================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you
subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.

__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 8617 (20130727) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com



=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your 
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) 
and unsubscribe from there.

Other related posts: