On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 2:38 AM, Simon Osborne <outspaced@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 01/02/2013 22:36, Jonathan Blake wrote: >> >>> (er) 25: you drop your Bow -> [lm: but you don't lose the item, right?] >> >> >> There's a similar situation in 146. Honestly, I don't know whether you >> lose it or not. Seems like you could pick it up after the combat in >> both sections, and it doesn't definitely say that you lose it like it >> often does, but maybe you're still supposed to lose it? The reader is >> going to have to make the call, but should we footnote it to let them >> know? > > > In situations like this in other books, we've substituted 'shoulder' for > 'drop' since it's usually clear that the Weapon is not discarded, and this > would obviate the need for another footnote. I'm ambivalent about changing this, but it's probably the right way to handle these. >>> (er) 139: you find only two unbroken items: a Shovel and a Pick. [jc: >>> Could >>> you keep the Shovel and the Pick? If yes, maybe each of them will occupy >>> 2 >>> slots in the Backpack (like in book 4).] >> >> >> Makes sense, but it's another judgement call that I don't think we can >> make. > > > Since the items are in Initial Capitals, it's implicit that they can be > taken; but without Joe's saying otherwise, it would seem they are > dwarf-sized, and so only take up one space each in your Backpack! Dwarf-sized, I like it. :) >>> (er) 155: If you possess Assimilance, [lm: you must have assimilance to >>> reach >>> this section] >> >> >> Then I guess they're going to get the bonus to the RNT. ;) The best >> way to fix this that I can think of is to remove that entire sentence >> and change the choices from this: >> >> If your total score is now 3 or lower, turn to 47. >> If it is 4 or higher, turn to 162. >> >> To this: >> >> If the number you have picked is 1, turn to 47. >> If it is 2 or higher, turn to 162. >> >> Or we could just leave it alone and let everyone who gets here get the >> bonus. Thoughts? > > > [bk: Technically 0-1 and 2-9.] > > [so: The following would be less invasive: "If -> As" : "As you possess > Assimilance, add 2 to the number you have picked."] "If -> As" is brilliant. That gets my vote. -- Jon ~~~~~~ Manage your subscription at //www.freelists.org/list/projectaon