-=PCTechTalk=- Re: {Spam?} Re: Re: LCD Guru's - what about this monitor?
- From: GuitarMan <gman.pctt@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <pctechtalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 14:23:54 -0400
Galt,
You won't notice any discernable difference when viewing static pages,
but drop in a fast paced game where the images is in constant motion and it
becomes an issue (blurring, artifacts, jagged lines, etc.). The double
conversion (digital > analog > digital) won't be able to keep up with the
onslaught of rapidly changing data. As new, faster cards are released, this
becomes less of an issue, but the current top speed of today's cards is
still not fast enough to overcome this problem completely. Of course, by
the time the cards get fast enough, everything will be DVI to DVI anyway,
making all of this a moot point. :O)
Peace,
GMan
"The only dumb questions are the ones that are never asked!"
----- Original Message -----
From: "galt" <galt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <pctechtalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2007 9:52 AM
Subject: -=PCTechTalk=- {Spam?} Re: Re: LCD Guru's - what about this
monitor?
>I have to differ.
>
> I have been using an Acer 19" wide LCD monitor for the last 2 years.
> This monitor has no DVI input. I have put a DVI-to-VGA convertor on my
> display card, and it gives me the best image quality.
>
> I too thought DVI-to-DVI gives the best image, and so when a friend
> planned to buy a new monitor, I suggested the Samsung 940BW 19-inch
> wide, with a DVI-DVI connection. I have tested this monitor with analog
> vs digital connection, and there is no noticeable difference in image
> quality.
--
Please remember to trim your replies (including this sentence and everything
below it) and adjust the subject line as necessary.
To unsubscribe or change your email settings:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/pctechtalk
To access our Archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PCTechTalk/messages/
//www.freelists.org/archives/pctechtalk/
Other related posts:
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: {Spam?} Re: Re: LCD Guru's - what about this monitor?
