Doug - Okay, here's one from Leno. I had to wait to record it last night. As before the left half of the image is the original and the right half is filtered to an effective 1/4 resolution of only 960x544, though no actual resizing was done. As you suggested, a discerning viewer can probably tell the difference a bit more easily here. I'll let everyone else decide whether it looks like it justifies 4 times as many pixels, though of course not 4x the bandwidth. See: www.trbarry.com/Leno_1080p_compare_qtr_rez.jpg And for Internet Explorer users, be sure to remember to zoom it to full size before comparing since your browser may otherwise just auto-fit it to your screen. - Tom Doug McDonald wrote: > Tom Barry wrote: > >>Doug McDonald wrote: >> >>The tests couldn't be done fairly if it was interlaced 1080i from >>video cameras since I'd have to deinterlace it and be accused of >>losing some detail that way. Isn't Leno video source? > > > Yes, and that's the point. It looks simply great. If you > convert it to STDV, it will look awful. Interlace is immaterial ... > it can only hurt. Pick a scene where the camera is static > and the talking heads not moving. > > >>And I don't think anybody would be very impressed if I showed a >>544p image could look close to a 720p image. They are just too >>close anyway. > > > That's where you are wrong, with the first rate 720p. Try some > ABC sitcoms ... at 720p you will easily read the notes stuck > to teh refrigerator ... at less than that you won't. > > > >>But if you can suggest a 1080p (or telecined 1080i) > > > What we don't want is telecined ... for some reason that > does not look as good. > > Doug McDonald > > > > OTA or cable > >>source I can easily record or or any download I'd be glad to do >>the test again on your source material. Pick the best one you can >>name. >> >>- Tom >> >> >> >> >>>Tom Barry wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>And currently most HDTV does not really contain >>>>that much detail. I have included a link to a captured image from >>>>the Pilot of the Medium TV series. The LEFT half of that image >>>>was left untouched. >>>> >>>>But on the RIGHT half of the image I filtered out all frequencies >>>>that would correspond to a spatial resolution higher than a 1/4 >>>>rez of 960x544, >>> >>> >>> >>>That is simply a TERRIBLE image to compare on, nevertheless, >>>the right half shows a noticeable case of the dread edge engancement. >>>It is terribly out of focus for most of the image. >>> >>> >>>I suggest using a much better test: for example, Leno or one of the >>>better ABC sitcoms (e.g. Less Than Perfect) with a far shot, >>>or really good sports shots in 720p or 1080i. >>> >>>Doug McDonald >>> >>> >>>---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: >>> >>>- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at >>>FreeLists.org >>> >>>- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word >>>unsubscribe in the subject line. >>> >>> >> >> >> >>---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: >> >>- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at >>FreeLists.org >> >>- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word >>unsubscribe in the subject line. >> >> > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: > > - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at > FreeLists.org > > - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word > unsubscribe in the subject line. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.