Manfredi, Albert E wrote: >John Shutt wrote: > > > >>But they're not. Why not? Because they know how >>difficult (read: expensive) it is to build an ATSC >>box that actually is plug and play. >> >> > >I thought LG claimed $50 by 2006, with date certain. Your reason can't be >right. > >I speculate instead that they simply want to minimize risk by having Congress >set a date certain for analog shutoff. And that the same would have happened >with DVB-T boxes if they had first been introduced in one of the Euro >countries where OTA TV languishes. > >Either that, or a conspiracy of pay-TV providers got to them. > > > >>It's disgusting that it comes down to someone like >>Bert arguing for ATSC when he hasn't even tried one >>yet. >> >> > >On the other hand, there's nothing quite as aggravating as petulant, whiny >children. We aren't getting DVB-T, okay? Get over it. > >Bert > > That is your opinion. I think we are getting a form of COFDM. It is only really a matter of when and after how much pain. Bob Miller ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.