"We do a lot of dancing around about 1920 x 1080 when it's becoming less and less likely (with smaller and smaller imagers) that there will be any significant energy at the high end of that."--Mark Schubin So is there any benefit to produce in 1080? Our new facility will probably be 1080@30i. Not because I chose it but because I want to be compatible with out PBS station for many reasons (they do our master control for us). But it also seems like a lot of equipment now days will allow one to produce in any format one wants when they want. True? But regarding the lens, I have seen demonstrations of 1080 and 720 with the same lenses (leica primes and angineau zoom) and found 1080 to look better. I realize that this is with some of the best lenses and top quality cameras. I can understand how there is no way to get the resolution necessary from a lens that shrinks the image down to those tiny imagers. So in reality, if one is using industrial grade HD equipment, I take it to be a case of "why bother"? But then, I have often seen cases where oversampling helps, even when the apparent high frequency energy is supposedly not there. I have seen it in audio, and certainly in photography. Is there no correlation? Dan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.