Tom Barry wrote: > Yes. Screeners are some kind of a crime against video > nature. (not a joke) > > I can't think of much else that can do more to damage > the economic value of movie making while at the same > time giving very little benefit to the public at large. Hmmm, Tom. I'm not sure, but you seem to be suggesting that more technically advanced pirated copies are less objectionable, because at least they look good? My conclusion would instead be that the higher quality pirated copy would do even more to damage the economic value, no? If I understand what you're saying, you fully intended to go see the theater release after viewing this screen copy, and in fact you did. Whereas with a higher quality pirated copy, the theater ticket would have been out of the question from the git-go? But from Hollywood's point of view, the screen copy didn't hurt them at all. You still bought the theater ticket, right? It only spoiled your fun, not their revenues. What bothers the Hollyowood types most is pirated HD versions, which should make screen copies the lowest priority in their hit list. Bert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.