[opendtv] Re: Execs see challenges bringing Net video to TV
- From: "John Willkie" <johnwillkie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 23:28:15 -0700
Not a sustainable business model for local tv. The networks can always go
around you to the MVPDs. Affiliation agreements have expiration dates, and
can only be extended by mutual agreement between the parties.
John Willkie
-----Mensaje original-----
De: opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] En
nombre de Tom Barry
Enviado el: Thursday, September 25, 2008 8:45 PM
Para: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Asunto: [opendtv] Re: Execs see challenges bringing Net video to TV
Yep. That was sort of my point. The world of broadband
broad/multi-casters might look much like the world of OTA broadcasters
now, with many of the same players (if they are quick about it) though
with smaller towers.
Who better to be a middleman between the networks, local advertisers,
and cable companies than the current local broadcasters?
On demand is pull, not push. I think that makes it for higher markup
material that can be sold to a smaller audience.
But any popular on demand material could be sold more cheaply to those
who were willing to watch it at some scheduled time with everybody else,
also making it 'an event'. The same material could be sold
simultaneously both ways, in different tiers. And PPV, starting only at
selected times is sort of in between. As the interval between start
times gets shorter (every 5 minutes?) it combines multicasting economy
with near-VOD benefits. And everywhere in between in a ratio of price,
resource usage, and convenience.
- Tom
John Shutt wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Barry" <trbarry@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>> OTOH, if it was real time and everybody watched it the same time in 8
>> mbps AVC then they would only have to make multicasting work. Five
>> major networks could be pushed for a total of only 40 mbps to the
>> whole neighborhood.
>
> Absolutely, but then you lose the "on demand" aspect, and have only
> created another broadcast medium. Nothing wrong with the per se, but
> definitely not a substitute for a TiVo in the home, which was the
> original intent of this thread.
>
> John
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
>
> - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
> FreeLists.org
> - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
> unsubscribe in the subject line.
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
Other related posts:
