Why would networks bear the cost of O&O OTA broadcast facilities when they can cover their viewers with satellite and cable? They would still have a local studio and do news but they wouldn't have to pay for all the power and upkeep of the stick. If, in 10 years, 99.5% of the Philadelphia viewers can get all the DTV 'network channels' over cable and satellite why would the broadcasters continue to pay for maintenance and power for a 1500 ft tower and transmitters? It doesn't make economic sense if you consider the power costs alone. Tom Barry wrote: >I don't think OTA is going away. But it seems possible the non-O&O >stations may all fail. They sort of are caught in a squeeze between the >network content owners and the need to be carried on cable. So if OTA >is not feasible and the networks gradually offer affiliates less and >less attractive terms I'm not sure what sort of bargaining position the >NAB members can maintain. > >As Craig says, it is probably just ownership caps that keep them alive. > >Eventually the networks or other associated Hollywood entities will >probably acquire them somehow and we can then change to a new model of >some sort. At that time we will probably come up with some new >broadcast standard, either as another transition or by high-ish >definition mobile video gradually winning a competitive war. > >Meanwhile the independents will bleed and we will all continue to wonder >what is going on, with so many apparently inexplicable decisions by the >power players. > >- Tom > > > >Cliff Benham wrote > > > >>Why bother? What's really happening is that over the air broadcasting=20 >>is going to be gone in 10 years or so. Why else would the FCC chose a >>system that doesn't work? Look at what is happening. Cable and satellite >>supply television to 85% of the homes in the US right now. The Networks >>have abandoned the NAB and these pages carry stories of new technical = >>means=20 >>of bringing TV into homes without over the air broadcasters being = >>involved. >>What other conclusion is there to draw? Over The Air is going away. >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>[mailto:opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Mark Aitken >>Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 2:21 PM >>To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>Subject: [opendtv] Re: AVSForum getting antsy over 8-VSB reception >> >> >>I would be glad to sit down and discuss/entertain/dream about various=20 >>options. I will be spending time in LV after the show...name the=20 >>time/place and I'll be there. I am convinced that the only avenue that=20 >>could possibly change the present course/situation is through Congress. >>The question of whether we SHOULD (or not) meet...well, that is another=20 >>matter...:-) Open for discussion. >> >>Stephen W. Long wrote: >> >> >> >> >>>Another question: How do you get ATSC reception when you are hiding in >>>your basement riding out a hurricane or tornado or HLS event? My = >>> >>> >>analog >> >> >> >>>NTSC signal in my basement using rabbit ears is snowy but can be = >>> >>> >>received, >> >> >> >>>and my family spent a long evening watching the local news and weather >>>while a tornado went skipping through Northern Virginia last year. = >>> >>> >>There >> >> >> >>>is no ATSC reception at all in my basement (that my 2nd generation box >>>could see - no channel reception at all). >>> >>>I argued back in 98 or so that reliance on a roof mounted antenna = >>> >>> >>during >> >> >> >>>bad weather events was not a good plan for the nation. >>> >>>My points are still valid - no one from ATSC has EVER provided a = >>> >>> >>reasonable >> >> >> >>>suggestion as to how 8VSB would handle emergency condition broadcasts. >>>Their answer then (and now I believe) was to use 2VSB. Well, ok, how = >>> >>> >>many >> >> >> >>>of the legacy 8VSB systems out there will do 2VSB? None that I have = >>> >>> >>ever >> >> >> >>>read about. How many transmitters (exciters) are ready to do 2VSB? = >>> >>> >>Not >> >> >> >>>many I'll wager. >>> >>>The most fascinating lie I am anticipating receiving is the argument = >>> >>> >>that >> >> >> >>>it will be ok to disenfranchise all of the existing receivers to give = >>> >>> >>all >> >> >> >>>new receivers the ability to also receive 2VSB, have the broadcast = >>> >>> >>flag, >> >> >> >>>etc. The lie will be that it will be ok to change to support changes = >>> >>> >>in >> >> >> >>>the ATSC spec and require new receivers, but not entertain a change to >>>COFDM because it will disenfranchise the existing receivers. >>> >>>The roll out of ATSC receivers has been so poor that there may actually = >>> >>> >>be >> >> >> >>>an opportunity next year to propose a new system, using the more robust >>>versions of COFDM coming out of Japan, etc., using H.264 for = >>> >>> >>compression, >> >> >> >>>native IP support, etc. To add even more fuel to the fire, we could = >>> >>> >>find a >> >> >> >>>way to specify HDTV using H.264 using less than 6MHz RF channels. = >>> >>> >>Wouldn't >> >> >> >>>THAT cause some stir. We could double/triple the number of over the = >>> >>> >>air >> >> >> >>>channels, not to mention the ability to shut down all non-SFN repeaters >>>that use up so many of the high UHF channels today. >>> >>>Should a group of us meet at the end of NAB, spend a long weekend = >>> >>> >>writing a >> >> >> >>>new US DTV specification, and submit it to CONGRESS (not the #$%^&* FCC >>>staff that got us into this mess)? >>> >>>At 07:59 AM 2/23/2005 -0500, you wrote: >>>=20 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>He was technically correct because ATSC was designed for directional=20 >>>>rooftop antennas. That was an incredibly stupid decision but = >>>> >>>> >>supposedly=20 >> >> >> >>>>true. >>>> >>>>I would love for Congress to actually pin down everybody involved as = >>>> >>>> >>to=20 >> >> >> >>>>whether they actually believe the digital transition can complete=20 >>>>without economical and functional indoor set top antenna reception. >>>> >>>>- Tom >>>> >>>> >>>>Bob Miller wrote: >>>> >>>> =20 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>Some are complaining that we need those 5th gen receivers now and=20 >>>>>bringing up old 8-VSB performance data, recently a big NO NO. >>>>> >>>>>In answer to CKNA on AVSForum dirk1843 puts it best.... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> =20 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?s=3Dc1d8d3905cfcbb1352091a= >>> >>> >>337d47 >> >> >> >>>9339&threadid=3D496065 >>>=20 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>>"I think most of the problem, is as CKNA said, poor antenna install = >>>>> >>>>> >>or=20 >> >> >> >>>>>wrong type for area." >>>>> >>>>>What can I say, now I understand, 8-VSB was designed for the right = >>>>> >>>>> >>type=20 >> >> >> >>>>>of area and some of us just happen to live in a "wrong type of area". >>>>> >>>>>Now it all makes sense. >>>>> >>>>>Bob Miller >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>>----------------------------------------------------------------------= >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>>>You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: >>>>> >>>>>- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings = >>>>> >>>>> >>at >> >> >> >>>>> =20 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>FreeLists.org=20 >>>=20 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>>- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the = >>>>> >>>>> >>word >> >> >> >>>>> =20 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>unsubscribe in the subject line. >>>=20 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>> =20 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: >>>> >>>>- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at >>>> =20 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>FreeLists.org=20 >>>=20 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word >>>> =20 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>unsubscribe in the subject line. >>>=20 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> =20 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: >>> >>>- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at = >>> >>> >>FreeLists.org=20 >> >> >> >>>- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word = >>> >>> >>unsubscribe in the subject line. >> >> >> >>>=20 >>> >>> >>> >>--=20 >> >>Regards, >>Mark A. Aitken Director, Advanced Technology >> >>*********************************** >>Sinclair Broadcast Group >>10706 Beaver Dam Road >>Hunt Valley, MD 21030 >>Business TEL: (410) 568-1535 >>Business MOBILE: (443) 677-4425 >>Business FAX: (410) 568-1580 >>E-mail: maitken@xxxxxxxxxx >>Text PAGE: page.maitken@xxxxxxxxxx >>www.newscentral.tv >>www.sbgi.net >>=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= >>=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >> >>"America will never be destroyed >>from the outside. If we falter >>and lose our freedoms, it will be >>because we destroyed ourselves." >> >>~ ~ ~ Abraham Lincoln ~ ~ ~ >>*********************************** >>CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: >> >>This email message and any files transmitted with it contain >>confidential information intended only for the person(s) to whom this >>email message is addressed. If you have received this email message in >>error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone or email and >>destroy the original message without making a copy. Thank you. >>*********************************** >> >> >> >> >>=20 >>=20 >>---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: >> >>- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at = >>FreeLists.org=20 >> >>- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word = >>unsubscribe in the subject line. >> >> >> >>---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: >> >>- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at >>FreeLists.org >> >>- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word >>unsubscribe in the subject line. >> >> >> >> > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: > >- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at >FreeLists.org > >- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word >unsubscribe in the subject line. > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.