At 8:47 AM +0200 10/19/04, jeroen.stessen@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >Lower layers should preferably be transmitted with more >robustness (like more forward error correction bits), to >maintain a watchable picture under bad reception conditions >like mobile, portable, bad weather, interference, etc. All of these ideas were veted during the U.S. advanced television process. They were ignored. > >My point is: don't write fixed standards with a short list >of "magic numbers", but write a standard that can grow. >Then you won't have to abandon it after every few years. You mean like MPEG-2? MPEG-2 could care less about the lists of format constraints that others have imposed upon the standard. Truth is that MPEG-2 is resolution independent, UP TO the performance limits established by the LEVELS defined by the standard. MPEG-2 even has all of the spatial and temporal scalability tools needed to deliver the layered structure you have described. They have rarely if ever been used. In a digital world, formats are meaningless. Jeroen is correct, just create enabling standards and manage their evolution as new technologies are developed. It seems to be working for the Internet (e.g. the Internet Engineering Task Force) and the Web (World Wide Web Consortium), despite efforts by a few companies to control evolution by propagating proprietary standards. Regards Craig ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.