-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 It would be great if we had a spec of how to map SP to websockets so that different implementations would remain compatible. Martin On 27/10/14 16:01, Garrett D'Amore wrote: > Guess I will need to add it as a transport for mangos then. :-) > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Oct 27, 2014, at 7:53 AM, Jack Dunaway <jack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > <mailto:jack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > >> Status update on the ws:// protocol: my earnest goal is to push >> to a fork by tomorrow with an announcement on this list >> requesting feedback and code review. I agree with Martin to >> consider a new release separately from evaluating a new WebSocket >> protocol! And I am very happy to see the buzz of new activity >> generated by your suggestion for a release, Dirkjan! >> >> Best regards, >> >> Jack R. Dunaway | Wirebird Labs LLC >> >> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 7:34 AM, Martin Sustrik >> <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >> > For your convenience I've summarised the release process here: > > http://nanomsg.org/development.html > > Martin > > On 27/10/14 10:24, Martin Sustrik wrote: >> On 27/10/14 10:17, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: >>> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Martin Sustrik >>> <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>> I would say just do the release now, if that's what you want >>>> to do. > >>> How do you feel about it? > >> +1 > >> There haven't been a release for a while. > >> Martin > > > >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUTmJlAAoJENTpVjxCNN9YAowIAI+7U6tiV2dlcLrD3CNm8blV TS1vL7kZobhgx9BUcQA/oraj7SHVOPOB+ErtDghPeaKhYJQQ0QHM7oX4ZL6wtC29 ArZwaGkLwWBHIKiYMU425DtSoOPUj8URFY0Rm1ByMop5PeEicjL0pCNLt2wm+6Cj GDNQkFvEUuXwHCdFZK+XmmNL+ip8PmSjlJEjMtF3Z1WbFplrxdS/3Oc6zC6/daa/ l4nwmd2+jQNlN6xE3YroxzSSixe6mSNpSom8KaVOm8hffu0j53oeRIzZaFkwlgYJ x/LccSi47VARQ6hJ6W43dupn+aWtz5efZVoG487/FXWRc+DRT40APmi8yHUql1k= =ge/J -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----