[nanomsg] Re: New release?
- From: Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 08:07:26 +0100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 03/11/14 03:55, Timothee Besset wrote:
> For the record I am a bit uneasy with pushing new releases when
> the Windows implementation has some significant issues. More
> specifically I'm thinking about
> https://github.com/nanomsg/nanomsg/pull/320, which has shown that
> our assumptions about I/O Completion Ports may be completely
> wrong.
>
> I realize we are not going to be able to fix those trivially, but
> maybe we should have some clear caveat warnings in the
> documentation for the release.
The real question is: Do we have any regressions? Would 0.5 perform
worse than 0.4? If not so, let's do the release. We're sill in beta
after all.
Martin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUVymuAAoJENTpVjxCNN9YaGcH/0WrNRiGJpKoNJ2EgtkR2JH1
HVGxL+MXgkFFV7sp+dDKKMURIwON73zhtn1haRXMRVRO4RYZOcIXOBaY4oXRQt+0
WQf2O3l/wYN5DaSWpAHqIZZ1gf8RBKhP+7mBvKpUv84mcDYjFEi8EUMY0GPMxEhC
tIW3vtKlqk92Y0NvVzCZlwNB8LpBRulrNp28hfI9hnpzqyixjbAUajjlDkItju7y
t7x5WePC8Bj76ycKT2ULepCxubZBL38Ow3DkS/TcLMjQDeAIAphA2d7/DFTl0nDO
9vbexzUFamvrzD9Lsb02WRyxYuUGT690nr5wfvK+yOdI/I2IplzSwTtDf/MbNYw=
=IjXT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Other related posts:
