[nanomsg] Re: New release?
- From: Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 05:31:25 +0100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 27/10/14 23:40, Drew Crawford wrote:
> Based on that experience, I would probably argue against selecting
> a JSON/msgpack/etc. for inclusion in core.
+1
Martin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUTxwdAAoJENTpVjxCNN9YiB4H/1qxQHk9c9J2/zS8h49Mj5SB
E4aqsywAEpGGpOPIfqHl/kem8SmVwnhO8iRGR1OD6nkRb7z6cZgMjEEaKpmClYkL
QJ/uGOMRLVG2FMAu+bbd9auNTZtaQtD8WjOsuyyo/13KC8oj3vlrjPTE00ykgkCj
W3kbGkv71FKUXa765vMl0XP0LWIdOCp4yDPzl0s+pO0UChM1ElztB9vBRRbflU8Y
vV7pmgUYxpaODgKQ/5ukRIj5SgzfYC3eRtSUL3uLl0eumZgvTbl/cYz/+AUJ6oq/
sSzAZSaMbAxDcEyZxKjFQWrcwjb0njerCMxHqWE2EwqyVuL4n6vAEB9DGKfnuNw=
=uYON
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Other related posts:
