Well, right and wrong. I'll agree that you are only the second part of the problem.<g> Yes, your children and mine, not actually having to work for a living, are out on summer break from college, just aching to put some of that cool stuff to use for the first time. And then MS started catching fury from the security community who were barking loudly, "Do something!!!". And they did. Now you'll notice that these things can't run on their own anymore and that they ship with their own address harvesting routines and mailing engine. This is primarily because the MAPI engine has been largely patched in SPs for Office 2000, XP jumps up and asks you about a piece of code trying to cycle through the address book and the large number of people who have moved off Office 97, at long freakin' last! Okay, so MS stopped the auto execute capabilities of a virus in their email engine. Good! Next step? How do we protect ourselves from those who haven't educated themselves to the point of knowing better yet? I mean, you couldn't possibly want something so foolish as legislation to curtail you, would you? Is there a need? Judging from the number of times I've had to empty the PostFix mail queue at work in the last couple weeks, I'd say, yes, there's still a problem to address. So the next thing I, as a user and administrator, appeal to is the end user. I ask that you learn and change your habits as if it *were* your responsibility. Microsoft, for their part, puts blocking into their apps and lets people educate themselves to the point where they learn how to disable certain attachment blocks. It might be a good bet that if they've learned that much then them may have learned a little about trusting email content. If you're on LookOut 2000 with the Security Patch, the marketers got you and you're SOL until you're either on an Exchange Server or you upgrade to Office XP. I don't mind giving time to education. I don't mind people getting upset and I also don't mind losing a little time once in a while to someone's mistake. I do mind the constant racket about "they should do this and they shouldn't do that." Microsoft has reacted to its market and taken outside guidance to try and find suitable solutions for these problems. They'd like to maintain their position. Blathering on to everyone but Microsoft about their decisions takes on an evangelical overtone rather than a productive dialog from which decisions can be made. I'm glad to not see too much of that in here. So, after all that, what *do you* think the root cause is? I'm not so sure we'll agree on that one as I definitely need to get a system to send me mail once in a while, automagically. It's pretty important to some other functions. And it's my opinion that the root cause is people in general. If we need to get specific, I'll go so far as to point at the faceless virus author and the na=EFve' end-user. Neither of those remains in that state forever but there's always a new member of each of those groups coming to the Internet every day and knowing what to do and what not to do is a learning experience. People don't come to the 'net fully educated. Finally, the reason I decided to respond is because of a very inflammatory comment in your message. I asked if you want legislation. Legislation is usually the result of a group of people admitting that they don't want to be responsible for this or that problem any longer. Being no fan of legislation or lazy attitudes, I'd like to suggest that, whether you believe it to be so or not, you really ought to act as if it is your responsibility. No, it doesn't make you bad but it sure as hell doesn't make me want to trust you enough to be polite. But since you already are taking measures on your own, the only thing I have to question is why you would make such a poorly considered statement unless the full ramifications of it didn't strike you at the time? And aren't you gonna welcome me back to the group?<g> Greg Chapman http://www.mousetrax.com=20 "Counting in binary is as easy as 01, 10, 11! With thinking this clear, is coding really a good idea?" > -----Original Message----- > From: mso-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx=20 > [mailto:mso-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Richard Davisson > Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2003 9:34 PM > To: mso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [mso] Re: exe files >=20 >=20 > Don't you think that the root cause of all of this should be=20 > taken care =3D of? My computer is protected just as yours is,=20 > but I don't like someone =3D telling me how to use it. It is=20 > not my fault that there are bored =3D ******** out there with=20 > nothing to do but make virii. It just happens =3D to be my=20 > choice that I choose to protect what I have with AV software=20 > =3D and the like. It doesn't make me a bad or irresponsible=20 > person if I =3D choose not to. Yes, maybe irresponsible to=20 > myself, but certainly not =3D others. =3D20 Richard L. Davisson=20 > http://www.groups.yahoo.com/group/WhatsonmyPalm > We do not have to visit a madhouse to find disordered=3D20 > minds; our planet is the mental institution of the universe. > ************************************************************* You are receiving this mail because you subscribed to mso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx or MicrosoftOffice@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To send mail to the group, simply address it to mso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To Unsubscribe from this group, send an email to mso-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "unsubscribe" (without the quotes) in the subject line. Or, visit the group's homepage and use the dropdown menu. This will also allow you to change your email settings to digest or vacation (no mail). //www.freelists.org/webpage/mso To be able to use the files section for sharing files with the group, send a request to mso-moderators@xxxxxxxxxxxxx and you will be sent an invitation with instructions. Once you are a member of the files group, you can go here to upload/download files: http://www.smartgroups.com/vault/msofiles *************************************************************