On 29/11/2014 5:04 AM, Miles Fidelman wrote: > Steve Litt wrote: > Well.... ok, though an editorial comment, if I might: "modular-debian" > and a list description that says: > > ----- > modular-debian: Toward a more modular Debian OS > > Debian has recently introduced systemd as default init system, replacing > the long-serviceable sysvinit system. As dependencies on systemd and > other monolithic services diffuse through the Debian package ecosystem, > users will tend to be forced to use systemd,This list is to discuss ways > to maintain a more modular Debian ecosystem, and to avoid snowballing > dependencies on a single init system. > ----- > > might, just might, be a tad confusing. Perhaps it's worth considering > changing the name and description earlier, rather than later. If you want this to be Debian Modular specific, ten this list is also useless to me. It's a bad name and the description is wrong -- unless it is right and in that case, I don't have any reason to remain here. Cheers A.