> [Original Message] > From: Eric Yost <eyost1132@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: 8/5/2006 8:02:27 PM > Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: ye olde political mindset > > > The term 'humane' is generally intended to define a response or attitude which takes into consideration fellow-feeling, compassion, empathy, justice and other values which we ascribe to ourselves alone. (Surely we intend the term to exclude the animal world -- although, just as surely, animals are sometimes more 'humane' than we humans.) > > For "humane," Merriam-Webster gives, "marked by compassion, > sympathy, or consideration for humans or animals." > > I believe my desire to see the Hez transformed into a > nonmilitary organization with no ties to Iran is indeed a > humane desire. > Not to mention that your desire is nothing more than a wish the way things are shaping up. Even if they do destroy Hezbollah, it will be a Pyrrhic victory. I wonder if Israel were given the chance to turn back the clock, I wonder if they wouldn't jump at the opportunity. > As for CR's, "birth pangs of a New Middle East," I think it > is a far more humane formulation than those "death to > Israel" remarks coming from Ahmadinejad. > > Ahmadinejad talks a good line while Israel turns a country into rubble. That makes Israel more humane. Go figure. ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html