Nothing noths... On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Redacted sender Jlsperanza@xxxxxxx for DMARC <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > We love D. P. Henry. Apparenty, he could read Heidegger in various > vernaculars! > > In a message dated 2/19/2015 10:03:19 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, > donalmcevoyuk@xxxxxxxxxxx writes: > Carnap is too poor an enemy against which to pit Heidegger > > Perhaps Ayer then. Apparently, Sir Freddie Ayer learned a lot from Carnap. > > Re: O. K.'s request for references, one should check the bibliographical > references to J. L. Scherb in "Philosophisches Jahrbuch", vol. 115. > > Scherb's essay is entitled > > "Nichtet das Nichts wirklich nicht? > > and subtitled: > > Analyse und Explikation: oder: eine deutsche Vorkriegsdebatte europäisch > belichtet" and while he does focus on the German context, he provides the > reference to D. P. Henry and Lesniewski among others. > > We have to grant that Scherb does base his exegesis on, to echo McEvoy, > Carnap v Heidegger, where Popper v Heidegger and Witters v Carnap (and > Ayer v > Carnap, say) seem also v. valid, too. > > Note that the title of Scherb's essay translates: > > So, does the nothing really NOT noth? > > which should amuse Ayer (and Carnap): the negation of nonsense IMPLICATES > nonsense (but the implicature is of course cancellable and conversational), > but of course does not *entail* nonsense. > > (cf. "It is false that the nothing noths"; or, to use Carnap's example, > "Caesar is not a prime number; in fact, Caesar is not a number"). > > The addition of 'really' is merely stylistic -- what Austin called a > 'trouser word'. > > Cheers, > > Speranza > > Refs: > > Ayer, Language, Truth and Logic -- reference to Heidegger on "Nothing" > Grice, "Heidegger is the greatest living philosopher". > Henry, D. P. > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, > digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html >