[lit-ideas] Re: The Strident Voice of Defeat

  • From: "Simon Ward" <sedward@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 19:50:09 -0000

So no apology then Lawrence, no chance of admitting you were wrong. Just some 
more revisionism.

Par for the course.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Lawrence Helm 
  To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2007 7:42 PM
  Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: The Strident Voice of Defeat


  Simon,

   

  Well, I suppose I deserved that, but what I meant by “got precisely what he 
deserved,” was in regard to his being defeated and deposed not executed.  

   

  Lawrence

   


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  From: lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
On Behalf Of Simon Ward
  Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2007 11:21 AM
  To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: The Strident Voice of Defeat

   

  "I’m waiting for a Leftist to say “of course he was a dirty rotten scoundrel” 
and following it with, “and got precisely what he deserved.”  Have you heard 
any Leftists on Lit-Ideas use that last clause?"

   

  I wrote, on 31st December:

   

  "Yet it's not the fact that Saddam was a monster that should be discussed. He 
was, and I wouldn't present an argument against the notion that he deserved the 
death penalty..."

   

  I repeated the same sentence in a post to you a few days later. What's the 
matter Lawrence, don't you read people's posts?

    ----- Original Message ----- 

    From: Lawrence Helm 

    To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 

    Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2007 6:59 PM

    Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: The Strident Voice of Defeat

     

    Not true, of course, but it’s easier to present false-hoods than read some 
of my notes.  People used to just complain about how long they were but your 
approach is rather unique: making up what you think I probably said and 
commenting as though I did.  And don’t say you’ve read all my notes Irene.  How 
many times have I reproached you for asking a question that I answered in an 
earlier but longish note?  I have covered all of these matters that you say I 
haven’t covered.  As to Leftists presenting the same arguments and identifying 
with Radical Islam, that is well-documented.  As to the Leftists here on 
Lit-Ideas jumping to Saddam’s defense each time I attack him, that has been 
well document also.  

     

    “Okay, tell me about Qutb and Militant Islam and how the Leftists mourn 
Saddam ... “  They say pretty much what you say Irene, Of course he was a dirty 
rotten scoundrel, but he didn’t do any harm to the US.  He wasn’t doing 
anything wrong by shooting at American and British planes who flew over his 
land.  He should have been left in charge of his own country.  The US had no 
right to depose him, etc.

     

    I’m waiting for a Leftist to say “of course he was a dirty rotten 
scoundrel” and following it with, “and got precisely what he deserved.”  Have 
you heard any Leftists on Lit-Ideas use that last clause?

     

    And Irene, you and some others continue to confuse “Militant Islam” with 
“Islamism.”  It is absurd to say there was no “Militant Islam” in Iraq before 
we got there.  Iraq was the most Militant Islamic nation in the Middle East 
before we got there.  

     

    Lawrence

     


----------------------------------------------------------------------------

    From: lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Andy Amago
    Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2007 10:44 AM
    To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
    Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: The Strident Voice of Defeat

     

     

    Or they quit arguing with you because you'll say anything and everything, 
no matter how contrary to reality, such as "Leftists" being sympathetic to 
Saddam.  That's total nonsense but you insist on it.  Every time you're 
pressured with facts about the mess in Iraq, you go back to Qutb or other such 
things, as if that explains everything.  So, I stopped talking to you.  Even as 
you go on and on about Militant Islam, you don't say what to do about it.  It's 
rather pointless, since even Bush says we're not winning in Iraq.  There was no 
Militant Islam in Iraq before we got there...  Okay, tell me about Qutb and 
Militant Islam and how the Leftists mourn Saddam ...  

     

     

       

      -----Original Message----- 
      From: Lawrence Helm 
      Sent: Jan 13, 2007 11:47 AM 
      To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
      Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: The Strident Voice of Defeat 



       People usually do that just before they quit arguing with me.

       

      Lawrence

       

       

    ------------------------------------------------------------------ To 
change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest 
on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html 



  --
  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition.
  Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.10/624 - Release Date: 1/12/2007 
2:04 PM




  --
  No virus found in this outgoing message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition.
  Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.10/624 - Release Date: 1/12/2007 
2:04 PM

Other related posts: