[lit-ideas] Re: [THEORIA] Treason trials for the NY Times & WAPO

  • From: JimKandJulieB@xxxxxxx
  • To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 02:01:10 EDT

 
<<Are you the  same person I thought logical the other day?>> 
And how would I, he, or  she, know if you thought whomever logical the other 
day?  When we all  develop ESP we'll let you know. 
Julie  Krueger 

a========Original Message========     Subj: [lit-ideas] Re: [THEORIA] Treason 
trials for the NY Times &  WAPO  Date: 7/4/06 3:29:13 P.M. Central Daylight 
Time  From: _lawrencehelm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (mailto:lawrencehelm@xxxxxxxxxxxx)   
To: _lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (mailto:lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)   Sent on:    


I wondered why your  most recent comment over on Theoria didnât make any 
sense and now I see  why.  You referred to a comment you mistakenly posted on 
Lit-Ideas and then  followed it up over on Theoria.  No great loss as far as I 
can 
see because  this one goes off on an illogical tangent.  Are you the same 
person I  thought logical the other day? 
Lawrence 
 
  
____________________________________

From:  lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
On Behalf Of Andy Amago
Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2006 11:35  AM
To: lit-ideas
Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: [THEORIA] Treason  trials for the NY Times & WAPO
 
 
Right on cue, Lawrence  dives straight into denial.   Did you read the part 
that Bush said on  television right after 9/11 that they were going to be going 
after terrorist  financing?  And have you read Ron Susskind's book?  Too 
treasonous for  you?  Once again, BUSH HIMSELF SAID RIGHT AFTER 9/11 that they 
were going  to be going after terrorist financing.  Where is the treason?   
Silencing the press at all costs, that's what you want.  Why don't you just  
say 
so?  Read Susskind's book (which you are too cowardly to do) and then  talk to 
me about this war, which btw your great grandchildren will be fighting,  
without the freedom of the press that you took away from  them.
 


 


 
----- Original Message -----  
 
From: _Lawrence Helm_ (mailto:lawrencehelm@xxxxxxxxxxxx)   
 
To:  _aamago@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (mailto:aamago@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) 
 
Sent: 7/4/2006  2:24:26 PM 
 
Subject: RE:  [THEORIA] Treason trials for the NY Times & WAPO
 

Right on cue, Irene,  you want to infringe the 2nd amendment in a discussion 
about the  1st amendment protecting treasonous behavior.  Right after  Larry 
says hed rather a few Americans were killed by the enemy than infringe  the 
1st amendment, you want the 2nd amendment infringed  and the guns of citizens 
registered.  You imply that only the gun  industry is opposed to that.  No, 
Irene, the bulk of Americans want to  retain the right of self-defense and 
dont 
want the government or anyone else  messing with that right.  How about 
registering every person who gives  aid and comfort to the enemy?  -- Make them 
get a 
license for that   -- have them fill out questionnaires and get written 
approval before they can  verbally support the enemy. 
Lawrence 
 
  
____________________________________
 
From:  Theoria: Discussion of philosophy and the arts  
[mailto:THEORIA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On  Behalf Of Andy Amago
Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2006 10:53  AM
To:  THEORIA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [THEORIA] Treason trials for  the NY Times & WAPO
 
 
The Times story is such  old news.  Bush himself said they were going after 
terrorist financing  right after 9/11.  It's just another recycled "news" story 
like all the  others, the way they recycle movies and fashions.  Flash!  Low  
Carb Diets [Cause Weight Loss/Cause Weight Gain].  Flash!  [BBC  headline 
this month that gayness is biological, first printed in the Atlantic  Monthly 
in 
1997] etc. etc.  Flash! U.S. Government Tracking  Terrorist Finances, as 
Promised by Bush on Television 5 Years  Ago!   The NYT doesn't want to work 
itself 
too hard, so it  recycles Bush's own words from public addresses from 2001 and 
calls  it news, and the conservatives get all excited about it.  All this  
focusing on "treason" and flag burning (for a flag not even made in this  
country) and gay rights, all these t rivial issues and nonissues has to be a  
way of 
taking attention away from insurmountable issues , like having no  borders 
and no money and an unwinnable war.  Absolutely nobody is  stepping up to the 
plate to address these things.  Instead they turn old  news into treason.  
Anybody read Ron Susskind's book, The One Percent  Doctrine?  Really 
frightening 
stuff.  Much better to  say Susskind is peddling treason and then focus on 
anti-flag burning  amendments.
 

 
I guess rampant gun  violence is happening because the 2nd Amendment is being 
suppressed.  I  heard a discussion that the reason the gun industry is 
against registration of  guns, which ultimately ties the hands of law 
enforcement, 
is so that guns  can't be traced back to the manufacturers and the 
manufacturers can't be  sued.  Like pharma, the gun industry is out to make 
money at all  
costs.  The U.S. is the world's #1 gun exporter.  Bad guys inside  the 
country, bad guys outside the country, we'll arm them all, as long as  they'll 
pay 
and there are no consequences for the seller.  Military  Keynesianism, that's 
what the Founding Fathers had in mind when they wrote the  Constitution.    
 


 


 
----- Original Message -----  
 
From: _Lawrence Helm_ (mailto:lawrencehelm@xxxxxxxxxxxx)   
 
To:  _THEORIA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (mailto:THEORIA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) 
 
Sent:  7/4/2006 11:11:37 AM 
 
Subject: Re:  [THEORIA] Treason trials for the NY Times & WAPO
 

Its too bad that  the 2nd Amendment isnt given the same indulgence as the  
1st.  Then, perhaps, we could defend ourselves against  traitors who were 
tipping off the enemy as to our tactics. 
Lawrence 



Other related posts: