And I wondered what you were talking about. Now I see it. What happened is that I customarily delete the address in the "To" box in order to not accidentally send a post prematurely. I add the address at the end (usually). Out of habit I clicked the lit ideas address instead of Theoria. But that doesn't get you off the hook for the Ron Susskind book. I dare you to read it. As far as logic, logic sometimes turns into something that looks like superstition. Sometimes it's useful, other times it's best avoided. ----- Original Message ----- From: Lawrence Helm To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: THEORIA Sent: 7/4/2006 4:28:32 PM Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: [THEORIA] Treason trials for the NY Times & WAPO I wondered why your most recent comment over on Theoria didn?t make any sense and now I see why. You referred to a comment you mistakenly posted on Lit-Ideas and then followed it up over on Theoria. No great loss as far as I can see because this one goes off on an illogical tangent. Are you the same person I thought logical the other day? Lawrence From: lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Andy Amago Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2006 11:35 AM To: lit-ideas Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: [THEORIA] Treason trials for the NY Times & WAPO Right on cue, Lawrence dives straight into denial. Did you read the part that Bush said on television right after 9/11 that they were going to be going after terrorist financing? And have you read Ron Susskind's book? Too treasonous for you? Once again, BUSH HIMSELF SAID RIGHT AFTER 9/11 that they were going to be going after terrorist financing. Where is the treason? Silencing the press at all costs, that's what you want. Why don't you just say so? Read Susskind's book (which you are too cowardly to do) and then talk to me about this war, which btw your great grandchildren will be fighting, without the freedom of the press that you took away from them. ----- Original Message ----- From: Lawrence Helm To: aamago@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: 7/4/2006 2:24:26 PM Subject: RE: [THEORIA] Treason trials for the NY Times & WAPO Right on cue, Irene, you want to infringe the 2nd amendment in a discussion about the 1st amendment protecting treasonous behavior. Right after Larry says hed rather a few Americans were killed by the enemy than infringe the 1st amendment, you want the 2nd amendment infringed and the guns of citizens registered. You imply that only the gun industry is opposed to that. No, Irene, the bulk of Americans want to retain the right of self-defense and dont want the government or anyone else messing with that right. How about registering every person who gives aid and comfort to the enemy? -- Make them get a license for that -- have them fill out questionnaires and get written approval before they can verbally support the enemy. Lawrence