> [Original Message] > From: Ursula Stange <Ursula@xxxxxxxxxx> > To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: 6/2/2005 11:04:37 AM > Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday waffle... > > > That's why I called it 'academic talent,' rather than intelligence. > Ursula > A.A. I'm not quite seeing the distinction. How does academic talent distinguish itself from intelligence? A thirst for knowledge perhaps? That would disqualify doctors and lawyers instantly, since doctors and lawyers are esentially artisans in their fields and their prime motive is money. Doctors in fact are notorious for clinging to old information and rejecting the new. Likewise the legal profession is built on precedent. No thirst or hunger for knowledge required for either. Andy Amago > Andy Amago wrote: > > > None of > >this is to say that intellectual standards should be lowered for those who > >do go on to a university, only that intelligence per se is not a major > >consideration in career plans. > > > > > >Andy > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, > digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html