--- John McCreery <mccreery@xxxxxxx> wrote: Therein lies the fascinating mystery of the > title, which > attracted my intention. And what Afrisi was up to in > reading _Lolita_ > with her students and now writing about that reading > in her book is > only very crudely approximated by trying to imagine > _Lolita_ as "a > tool of women's liberation." Yes, I reflected later that it might have to do also with cherishing individuality, not only with women's liberation. But then, bad me, I began to wonder why it had to be done in a group with an older, Western-educated woman as a spiritual leader. Note also Afrisi's use of "my girls" and "we": "Here and now in that other world that cropped up so many times in our discussions, I sit and reimagine myself and my students, my girls as I came to call them, reading _Lolita_ in a deceptively sunny room in Tehran. But to steal the words from Humbert, the poet/criminal of _Lolita_, I need you, the reader, to imagine us, for we won't really exist if you don't. Against the tyranny of time and politics, imagine us the way we sometimes didn't dare to imagine ourselves: in our most private and secret moments, in the most extraordinarily ordinary instances of life, listening to music, falling in love, walking down shady streets or reading _Lolita_ in Tehran. And then imagine us again with all this confiscated, driven underground, taken away from us. How can Afrisi be so sure that they all felt that way ? Did any of her girls, perhaps, not like Lolita ? O.K. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/ ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html