Dear John, apologies for the silence - I am still reading the book, but I'd dropped ou= t of the list and news in general for a while as all the news was dishearte= ning. (The last straw was reading in the Economist about Sudanese atrocitie= s). Still, here's my next round of questions, this time triggered by Part II, i= n which she describes the Islamic Revolution's effects on the University ca= mpus. It seems that at the start idealism was in the air, and moderates wer= e the majority - "at all times, even after the revolution, the Muslim stude= nts, especially the more fanatical ones, were a minority overshadowed by th= e leftist and secular student groups". Soon, however, a shift in power takes place, and the fanatical minority tak= es over. What happened? How did it happen? (I had always lazily assumed that the ove= rthrow of the Shah was by the fanatics - with the support of the population= , but led by the Islamists.) mo > ------------Original Message------------ > From: John McCreery <mccreery@xxxxxxx> > To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Date: Wed, May-12-2004 10:10 PM > Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Diabetes and obesity > = > = > On 2004/05/13, at 10:48, Mohammad Al-Ubaydli wrote: > = > > Dear all, > > we saw a great lecture today at NIH about the epidemiology of diabetes = > > and =3D > > obesity. The speaker is great, and the videocast is at: > > > > http://videocast.nih.gov/ram/wals051204.ram > > > > mo > > > = > Mohammad, > = > Are you still reading Reading Lolita in Tehran? > = > John McCreery > = > = > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, > digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html > = > = ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html