And I repeat the question: where might this stop?Would you advocate the vaporisation of a wayward muslim teenager who swears to his friends he's going to kill an infidel? Would you advocate the vaporisation of the son of an already vaporised terrorist on the grounds that one day he will seek revenge. (Pre-emptive vaporisation.) Would you advocate the vaporisation of ETA members who had a hand in the recent bombing of Madrid Airport? Would you advocate the vaporisation of ex-IRA members?
"It's appropriate to be angry about this and to seek to exterminate those who would carry out terror attacks."
Eric, that's one sentence away from genocide. How do you determine who will carry out terrorist attacks? By their religion?
Think it through.----- Original Message ----- From: "Eric Yost" <eyost1132@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 8:57 PM Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Max Boot and Anger
Where might this stop Eric?I thought I was reasonably clear on this. Al-Qaeda has issued a fatwa against Americans. In 2002, all US citizens were put on notice -- as is traditional with holy war -- to either convert to Islam or die. Also in 2002, Bin Laden got a fatwa from some Saudi nutjob cleric, authorizing the use of nuclear weapons in his jihad against us. It's appropriate to be angry about this and to seek toexterminate those who would carry out terror attacks. It's also appropriate to remind people that combat is not over just because we want it to be over.------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html