[lit-ideas] Re: Max Boot and Anger
- From: "Simon Ward" <sedward@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 17:48:57 -0000
"And yes...yes...yes...I am indeed advocating vaporizing and
killing terrorists. Every single one. It would be fine if
not even their bones remained."
Who gets to define who is or isn't a terrorist? And does their cause matter?
Does their religion? Where might this stop Eric?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric Yost" <eyost1132@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 5:08 PM
Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Max Boot and Anger
>>The DSM is written by pharma
So? The point of my post was that there are many kinds of anger. Some are
personality disorders, some are existential crises, and some types of
anger are a justifiable response to real situations. Your post does little
to parse out these distinctions; you concentrate on vilifying the parser.
And yes...yes...yes...I am indeed advocating vaporizing and killing
terrorists. Every single one. It would be fine if not even their bones
remained.
Similarly, I advocate killing criminals holding hostages at gunpoint.
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
Other related posts:
