[lit-ideas] Re: Max Boot and Anger
- From: "Simon Ward" <sedward@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 22:30:19 -0000
By inference, it seems you'd advocate vaporisation (or just plain death) for
anyone found guilty of using terrorist methodology, anyone about to use
terrorist methodology or anyone planning to. Would you advocate death to
anyone aiding and abetting terrorists, financing them for example.
Should Oliver North be given the death penalty for financing the Contras?
Should the organisers of Noraid be given the death penalty for financing the
IRA?
Should the CIA handlers who financed bin Laden....
In short, when does anger end and reconcilation begin? Is it when the Fatwa
is removed or when the last members of Al Qaeda/ETA/Contras/IRA/any
terrorist organisation you can think of cease to exist.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric Yost" <eyost1132@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 9:32 PM
Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Max Boot and Anger
>Would you advocate the vaporisation of a wayward muslim
teenager who swears to his friends he's going to kill an infidel?
No. If he is actually trying to do it though, yes.
>Would you advocate the vaporisation of the son of an
already vaporised terrorist on the grounds that one day he will seek
revenge. (Pre-emptive vaporisation.)
No.
>Would you advocate the vaporisation of ETA members who had
a hand in the recent bombing of Madrid Airport?
Yes, if there was no other way to bring them to justice.
>Would you advocate the vaporisation of ex-IRA members?
No, not just because they were ex-IRA.
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
Other related posts:
