Mike Geary wrote:
>> Is "Andy" saying that those people who choose to join Iraq's new armed forces are different from their American counterparts in some way: I.Q. or hand-eye co-ordination or willingness to listen and to be subject to military discipline? What makes them "untrainable"? <<
I know nothing personally of these matters -- having spent 10 years assiduously avoiding the draft during Vietnam as did all the Bush men so eager to wage war in Iraq -- but it's my understanding from what I've read that the training problems aren't with the troops nearly so much as with the officier corps that we eliminated after our "victory". I would never have believed it, but apparently there's something to this management stuff besides kissing ass. Maybe they're right.
Let me suggest two other factors:
1. Aiming a tank gun is NOT like aiming a rifle; it's a fairly technological action, requiring lots of thought while one is bouncing around inside a hot dusty metal box. The Russian tanks were much "simpler" than American designs, but that increases the need for the Iraqi tank gunner to make compensations on the fly. This would be difficult for American soldiers, too, but Americans are inside a much more comfortable and much more sophisticated metal box that does most of the compensations for the gunner.
I don't think I would say it's a "defect" in Iraqi troops if they are not all that interested in using telescopic sighted rifles.