[LRflex] Re: digital
- From: jdatkins <jdatkins@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 12:38:43 -0700
Ed: I have pondered the same question. About 10 mos. ago, I decided upon an
Olympus 500, with the two lenses, and knew that my investment in Leica R glass
was "money in the bank." I am about to order an adapter from Stephen at
Cameraquest, and I know that he will take good care of me. The only downside,
which is well documented, is the doubling of the focal length, but Canon and
Nikon face similar problems. You need to decide if your photography is
long-range or wide angle. So, you are looking at factors of 1.3, 1.5, or 2.0.
It just depends upon your type of photography.
Ed Bougas wrote:
> I'm looking to upgrade to a SLR digital and would like to use my Leica R
> glass. The more I research the digital SLRs the more confusing it gets.
> I'dappreciate any suggestions for a moderately priced digital SLR (under
> $1000) body. I've looked at the new Nikon D80 and the Cannon 30D. Any
> othersuggestions re SLR vs 4/3s? Thanks to all, Ed
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> The average US Credit Score is 675. The cost to see yours: $0 by
> Experian.[1]
>
> --- Links ---
> 1 http://g.msn.com/8HMAENUS/2755??PS=47575
> ------
> Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
> http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
> Archives are at:
> //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
Other related posts:
