Yep, otherwise I would have looked at/bought a DMR. Aram >From: David Young <telyt@xxxxxxxxx> >Reply-To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >Subject: [LRflex] Re: and on... the R10 >Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 10:57:04 -0700 > >At 08/05/2007, you wrote: > >I agree. I thought it was ugly. Wnen I first handled on I thought it >was > >too heavy. Bought one, used it for a while and I love it. Still a bit > >heavy, but it handles so well and is so easy to use. Rugged, accurate. >R10 > >is this package would be a no-brainer for me. R10 in R4 size pacakge >with > >r8 ergonomics would be even better. > > > >Aram > > >HI Aram! > >Agreed... but an R10 in an R9+DMR sized package would be a no-go, in >my estimation. > >I too, would like to see the '10' in a smaller box.. more like the >Canon 20D & 30D. > >Cheers! > >--- > >David Young, >Logan Lake, CANADA > >Wildlife Photographs: http://www.telyt.com/ >Personal Web-pages: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt >Stock Photography at: http://tinyurl.com/2amll4 > >------ >Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: > http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm >Archives are at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/ _________________________________________________________________ Now you can see trouble?before he arrives http://newlivehotmail.com/?ocid=TXT_TAGHM_migration_HM_viral_protection_0507 ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/