Re: freedom scientific weird numerical system
- From: "Yardbird" <yardbird@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 16:25:45 -0700
of course not. But there's no harm in venting some reasonable annoyance for
a few posts, you know? don't worry about it. Thanks.
From: "Allison Mervis" <allisonfm@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 2:25 PM
Subject: Re: freedom scientific weird numerical system
There most likely isn't a whole lot that can be done about it no matter what
our opinions may be on the matter, so arguing like Talmudic scholars or
lawyers just seems like a waste of time and energy if you ask me. :-)
Allison
----- Original Message -----
From: "Yardbird" <yardbird@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 5:01 PM
Subject: Re: freedom scientific weird numerical system
> Hello Allan,
> Why we should even have to think about their DOZENS of internal builds and
> how they number them is completely beyond me. Why we should be arguing
> like
> Talmudic scholars (or lawyers, tip of the hat to A.) about this is JUST
> LAUGHABLE. I never heard of any company that names its public products so
> elaborately and confusingly. Totally off the wall.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Allan Wong" <allan.wkf@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 1:31 PM
> Subject: Re: freedom scientific weird numerical system
>
>
> Messagehi Adrian,
> I'm agree that 2 should come before 5, but how that a 4 digits number come
> before the 3 digits 1? the developer in FS start develop
> jaws 9.0 from the ground up, meaning version 9.0 is start from 9.0.1 to
> 9.0.100 to 9.0.1000. so therefore the 2 come after 5 because
> it is revision 2000 and not revision 200 and the 5 is revision 500.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Warmest Regards,
> Allan Wong
>
>
>
> From: Adrian Spratt
> Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 04:11
> To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: freedom scientific weird numerical system
>
>
> Hi, Allan.
> This thread is undeniably JAWS-related, but we will test the patience of
> other listers and the moderator if we keep it up. But to
> answer your challenge to Mark, here's why he has a point, so to speak.
> Just
> take the first digit after the decimal point. For the
> current update, it's 2, while for the previous it's 5. I think you'll
> agree,
> .5 , or one-half, is greater than .2, or one-fifth, and
> yet the lower number designates the more recent update. At best, a
> paradox.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Allan Wong
>
> hi, you are absolutely wrong! read this numbering carefully,
>
> the previously release is J9.0.552 which is 552 and the currently release
> is
> J9.0.2152 which is 2152. so how you tell a number 2 is
> before 5? and how you calculate 552 after 2152?
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Warmest Regards, Allan Wong
>
> From: MarkF
> Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 02:58
> Is it just me and all the people I have talked to. numerically speaking
> jaws
> 9.00.522 should be the latest update NOT 9.00.2152
>
> This is not the way versions numbers should be labeled .2 comes before .5.
>
> Has anyone else thought this strange?
>
> Mark
>
> The beginning of strife is [like] letting out water, So abandon the
> quarrel
> before it breaks out.
>
> --
> JFW related links:
> JFW homepage: http://www.freedomscientific.com/
> Scripting mailing list:
> http://lists.the-jdh.com/listinfo.cgi/scriptography-the-jdh.com
> JFW List instructions:
> To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
> jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
> Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
>
> If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or
> the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather
> contact the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature database 3094 (20080512) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
--
JFW related links:
JFW homepage: http://www.freedomscientific.com/
Scripting mailing list:
http://lists.the-jdh.com/listinfo.cgi/scriptography-the-jdh.com
JFW List instructions:
To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the
way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the
list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
JFW related links:
JFW homepage: http://www.freedomscientific.com/
Scripting mailing list:
http://lists.the-jdh.com/listinfo.cgi/scriptography-the-jdh.com
JFW List instructions:
To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the
way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the
list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Other related posts:
