Re: freedom scientific weird numerical system

  • From: Judith Bron <jbron@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 19:42:32 -0400

MessageAs one lister put it earlier, we simply use the product.  We shouldn' be 
burdened with all the extra numbers.  Most of us use the computer and software 
for reasons other than keeping track of FS's accomplishments.  Judith
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Caroline 
  To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 7:00 PM
  Subject: Re: freedom scientific weird numerical system

  This numbering system is truly not that difficult to understand. As others 
have said, there are internal builds that happen and there needs to be a way to 
differentiate them from one another. 252 is just that, two hundred and 
fifty-two. 2152 is two thousand one hundred and fifty-two. It's a higher 
number, therefore it's a newer build version. It is not out of sequence. 
Sometimes I wonder if people are just finding little ways to nitpick simply 
because it's Freedom Scientific. Just my opinion.


    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: MarkF 
    To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 1:58 PM
    Subject: freedom scientific weird numerical system

    Is it just me and all the people I have talked to. 
     numerically speaking jaws 9.00.522 should be the latest update NOT 

    This is not the way versions numbers should be labeled
    .2 comes before .5.

    Has anyone else thought this strange?


    The beginning of strife is [like] letting out water, So abandon the quarrel 
before it breaks out.

    __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature 
database 3094 (20080512) __________

    The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

Other related posts: