Re: freedom scientific weird numerical system
- From: Judith Bron <jbron@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 19:42:32 -0400
MessageAs one lister put it earlier, we simply use the product. We shouldn' be
burdened with all the extra numbers. Most of us use the computer and software
for reasons other than keeping track of FS's accomplishments. Judith
----- Original Message -----
From: Caroline
To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 7:00 PM
Subject: Re: freedom scientific weird numerical system
This numbering system is truly not that difficult to understand. As others
have said, there are internal builds that happen and there needs to be a way to
differentiate them from one another. 252 is just that, two hundred and
fifty-two. 2152 is two thousand one hundred and fifty-two. It's a higher
number, therefore it's a newer build version. It is not out of sequence.
Sometimes I wonder if people are just finding little ways to nitpick simply
because it's Freedom Scientific. Just my opinion.
Caroline
----- Original Message -----
From: MarkF
To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 1:58 PM
Subject: freedom scientific weird numerical system
Is it just me and all the people I have talked to.
numerically speaking jaws 9.00.522 should be the latest update NOT
9.00.2152
This is not the way versions numbers should be labeled
.2 comes before .5.
Has anyone else thought this strange?
Mark
The beginning of strife is [like] letting out water, So abandon the quarrel
before it breaks out.
__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 3094 (20080512) __________
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
http://www.eset.com
Other related posts:
