RE: freedom scientific weird numerical system
- From: "DJ" <grouloc@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 16:19:41 -0400
Simply count the number of numbers after the last period. It's not rocket
science.
_____
From: jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Adrian Spratt
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 4:11 PM
To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: freedom scientific weird numerical system
Hi, Allan.
This thread is undeniably JAWS-related, but we will test the patience of
other listers and the moderator if we keep it up. But to answer your
challenge to Mark, here's why he has a point, so to speak. Just take the
first digit after the decimal point. For the current update, it's 2, while
for the previous it's 5. I think you'll agree, .5 , or one-half, is greater
than .2, or one-fifth, and yet the lower number designates the more recent
update. At best, a paradox.
----- Original Message -----
From: Allan Wong
hi, you are absolutely wrong! read this numbering carefully,
the previously release is J9.0.552 which is 552 and the currently release is
J9.0.2152 which is 2152. so how you tell a number 2 is before 5? and how you
calculate 552 after 2152?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Warmest Regards, Allan Wong
From: MarkF
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 02:58
Is it just me and all the people I have talked to. numerically speaking jaws
9.00.522 should be the latest update NOT 9.00.2152
This is not the way versions numbers should be labeled .2 comes before .5.
Has anyone else thought this strange?
Mark
The beginning of strife is [like] letting out water, So abandon the quarrel
before it breaks out.
Other related posts:
