RE: JFW/PROGRAMMING

  • From: "Cy Selfridge" <cyselfridge@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 05:52:44 -0600

Yes, JAWS sure would have helped a whole lot.

I am sorry – but – I also wish we still had DOS.

I do miss it even though W7 and such do have an awful lot of really neat things.

One of the nicest features of W7 is that after something unforseen happens and 
you have to fire back up you are exactly where you were when the “oopsie” 
occurred.

Remember the old days when such an event would cause the computer to wander 
through the entire C drive to see if all was alright and you are sitting there, 
foaming at the mouth, needint to get that last email or project completed?

Well, perhaps I do not miss DOS as much as I thought I did. (LOLLOLLOL)

Cy, The Anasazi 

 

From: jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
Tom Lange
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 9:52 PM
To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: JFW/PROGRAMMING

 

Hi,

I wish I'd known about JAWS back in the Eighties, it might have made life 
easier for me in some respects.  I did mainframe programming for IBM from 1978 
to 1994 in a VM environment, programming using the APL programming language up 
until around 1987 or so.  After that I programmed using Rexx, which was very 
English-like.  

 

I didn't know about screen reading solutions for the PC until 1994, so all 
through that time I was at IBM, I used an Optacon to read the screen.  That was 
actually pretty cool, if a bit inefficient.

 

Tom

 

----- Original Message ----- 

From: Bob W <mailto:rwiley45@xxxxxxxxxxx>  

To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 

Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 8:20 AM

Subject: Re: JFW/PROGRAMMING

 

Hi Prakash.

 

I am retired now, but was a mainframe programmer from the early seventies to 
the late 1990s. I used jaws from the early 80s to my retirement. I don't think 
I could have done programming without it.

 

What you are proposing--going from a visual programmer to a nonvisual 
programmer--is a daunting, but not impossible, challenge.

 

I suspect that you do not know Braille. Knowledge of Braille and an 80-cell 
display would be a great tool to have in your arsenal. You don't need to learn 
literary Braille, or even grade two Braille (though this might be helpful. But, 
I would suggest that you emphasize learning computer Braille, which in some 
ways is superior to literary Braille.

 

As I said earlier, your challenges may seem daunting, but they can also be fun, 
and they may enhance your creativity.

 

Good luck, and when you run into problems, this list is a great place to seek 
answers.

 

Bob

 

 

 


A learning experience is one of those things that says, 'You know that thing 
you just did? Don't do that.' Douglas Adams  

----- Original Message ----- 

From: john.falter <mailto:john.falter@xxxxxxxxxxx>  

To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 

Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 11:04 PM

Subject: Re: JFW/PROGRAMMING

 

I programmed in assembly language and Cobol for 8 years using JAWS..

 

----- Original Message ----- 

From: PRAKASH P <mailto:P.Prakash@xxxxxxx>  

To: JFW@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 

Cc: PRAKASH P <mailto:P.Prakash@xxxxxxx>  

Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 10:42 AM

Subject: JFW/PROGRAMMING

 

I HAVE RECENTLY  COME TO A POINT WHERE I CANNOT DO ANYTHING VISUALLY ON THE 
COMPUTER SCREEN. 

I HAVE BEEN USING zOOMtEXT AUDIO  EFFECTIVELY UNTIL NOW. But now I am told JFW  
is the way to go. 

 

Can someone give  me a good  view/opinion of how effective/efficient would it b 
to do programming for a living with or without JFW. 

 

I have 20 years of programming experience with MS environments being the  
latest.  I am able to read all ctooll tip  based text  and the program text 
itself  but  not sure if I can  compete with 

The visually   enhanced set.  I know I have much learning to do but I would 
like  a seasoned person to give  a sense of whats possible. 

I am a good learner if not a speedy one. 

 

I am trying to  figure out if I should or should not give up on serious 
implementation responsibilities. 

 

Thanks for any and all  input  I can get. 

 

Prakash

 

 

 

Prakash

 

This email and any attachments are intended solely for the use of the 
individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may be confidential and/or 
privileged.

If you are not one of the named recipients or have received this email in 
error, 

(i) you should not read, disclose, or copy it,

(ii) please notify sender of your receipt by reply email and delete this email 
and all attachments,

(iii) Dassault Systemes does not accept or assume any liability or 
responsibility for any use of or reliance on this email.

For other languages, go to http://www.3ds.com/terms/email-disclaimer 

Other related posts: