RE: JFW/PROGRAMMING
- From: "Cy Selfridge" <cyselfridge@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 18:07:16 -0600
George,
You are correct as I also used one of those IBM talking terminals.
Worked really well when direct connect to the mainframe but, as I recall, when
we went to networking we went to micro computers for connection and that is
when I was “blessed” with a micro loaded with Artic and the Symphonic 215 board.
It was better than nothing but, not by much. (LOLLOLLOL)
Cy
From: jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
George Marshall
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 9:40 AM
To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: JFW/PROGRAMMING
Tom:
I am surprised IBM didn't give you one of there terminals with speech. I also
programmed on IBM 360,370 and 9000's. I think about 1982 IBM developed a
terminal with speech, had a numeric like pad attached with a cord used to
control reading of the screen.
George R. Marshall
marshall.geoma4@xxxxxxxxx
----- Original Message -----
From: Tom Lange <mailto:trlange@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 11:51 PM
Subject: Re: JFW/PROGRAMMING
Hi,
I wish I'd known about JAWS back in the Eighties, it might have made life
easier for me in some respects. I did mainframe programming for IBM from 1978
to 1994 in a VM environment, programming using the APL programming language up
until around 1987 or so. After that I programmed using Rexx, which was very
English-like.
I didn't know about screen reading solutions for the PC until 1994, so all
through that time I was at IBM, I used an Optacon to read the screen. That was
actually pretty cool, if a bit inefficient.
Tom
----- Original Message -----
From: Bob W <mailto:rwiley45@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 8:20 AM
Subject: Re: JFW/PROGRAMMING
Hi Prakash.
I am retired now, but was a mainframe programmer from the early seventies to
the late 1990s. I used jaws from the early 80s to my retirement. I don't think
I could have done programming without it.
What you are proposing--going from a visual programmer to a nonvisual
programmer--is a daunting, but not impossible, challenge.
I suspect that you do not know Braille. Knowledge of Braille and an 80-cell
display would be a great tool to have in your arsenal. You don't need to learn
literary Braille, or even grade two Braille (though this might be helpful. But,
I would suggest that you emphasize learning computer Braille, which in some
ways is superior to literary Braille.
As I said earlier, your challenges may seem daunting, but they can also be fun,
and they may enhance your creativity.
Good luck, and when you run into problems, this list is a great place to seek
answers.
Bob
A learning experience is one of those things that says, 'You know that thing
you just did? Don't do that.' Douglas Adams
----- Original Message -----
From: john.falter <mailto:john.falter@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 11:04 PM
Subject: Re: JFW/PROGRAMMING
I programmed in assembly language and Cobol for 8 years using JAWS..
----- Original Message -----
From: PRAKASH P <mailto:P.Prakash@xxxxxxx>
To: JFW@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: PRAKASH P <mailto:P.Prakash@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 10:42 AM
Subject: JFW/PROGRAMMING
I HAVE RECENTLY COME TO A POINT WHERE I CANNOT DO ANYTHING VISUALLY ON THE
COMPUTER SCREEN.
I HAVE BEEN USING zOOMtEXT AUDIO EFFECTIVELY UNTIL NOW. But now I am told JFW
is the way to go.
Can someone give me a good view/opinion of how effective/efficient would it b
to do programming for a living with or without JFW.
I have 20 years of programming experience with MS environments being the
latest. I am able to read all ctooll tip based text and the program text
itself but not sure if I can compete with
The visually enhanced set. I know I have much learning to do but I would
like a seasoned person to give a sense of whats possible.
I am a good learner if not a speedy one.
I am trying to figure out if I should or should not give up on serious
implementation responsibilities.
Thanks for any and all input I can get.
Prakash
Prakash
This email and any attachments are intended solely for the use of the
individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may be confidential and/or
privileged.
If you are not one of the named recipients or have received this email in
error,
(i) you should not read, disclose, or copy it,
(ii) please notify sender of your receipt by reply email and delete this email
and all attachments,
(iii) Dassault Systemes does not accept or assume any liability or
responsibility for any use of or reliance on this email.
For other languages, go to http://www.3ds.com/terms/email-disclaimer
Other related posts:
