[interfacekit] Re: __mime_table
- From: Isaac Yonemoto <ityonemo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 19:12:31 -0500 (CDT)
> On one hand I don't think that should be an application wide decision -
> - an application may run threads of different priority -- and on the
> other hand I still think that threads of little importance can be
> identified by their priority, which would be <= B_LOW_PRIORITY. As the
> registrar's updater thread would have B_LOW_PRIORITY it is even
> guaranteed that the low priority threads won't be starved by the
> updater thread.
Some low priority threads run at priority lower than B_LOW_PRIORITY, but
I'd imagine that they wouldn't care too much -- since these are likely to
be more frivolous than fixing up the filesystem, which, is important to
the smoooooth operation of BeOS.
Isaac
Other related posts:
