[interfacekit] Re: __mime_table
- From: "Ingo Weinhold" <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: interfacekit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 23:13:24 CEST (+0200)
> >Very good point. Perhaps it is sufficient to not just to look, if
> > there
> >are spare CPU cycles at all, but, in case there are no spare cycle,
> > to
> >analyze what priority the processes have that consume most of the
> cycles.
> >Supposing that SETI and similar background number crunching
> > processes
> have
> >the lowest imaginable priority, this seems to be a reasonable
> > strategy.
>
> Another possibility, which might be a bit too hackish, would be to
> set
> up a BMessageRunner so that our sniffing happens on a reasonably
> regular
> schedule regardless of what else is going on.
Mmh, wasn't it a bit annoying, if you're watching a movie and suddenly
it starts dropping frames because the registrar thinks that the time
was ripe for updating the MIME database?
CU, Ingo
Other related posts:
