Hi folks, When writing the BMimeType::GetSupportingApps() tests, I decided to manually build my own supporting apps table and compare it to the information returned by GetSupportingApps(). The strange thing was, for certain types, GetSupportingApps() returned *more* app signatures than I had collected by compiling the META:FILE_TYPES attributes of all the "application/" types. Furthermore, I was finding app signatures that didn't even exist in my database. I eventually discovered that this extra information was being taken from the file "__mime_table" in the root directory of the MIME database (which is just a flattened BMessage). The interesting thing is, if you change the __mime_table file (i.e. by unflattening it, adding to it, then re-flattening it), it 1) has no effect on GetSupportingApps() (not too surprising, the registrar probably caches it) but 2) is eventually (i.e. within a few minutes) restored to its original condition by some agent (again, assumingly the registrar). I assume, then, that somewhere there is an API (possibly just a message protocol to the roster/registrar) to make concrete changes to the __mime_table, as my __mime_table is larger than the __mime_table of a clean install, and contains entries from applications I once installed but have since removed (such as BeatWare Mail-It). Does anybody know about such an API (presumably from the olden days) off hand? I suppose we ought to try to support this API if we want to be truly backwards compatible, but I don't currently have any great suggestions as to how we should go about this. I'm not going to put too much effort into it right now, as there are other things that need doing, but I thought I'd mention it here so we don't forget to possibly look into it at a later date. :-) One other MIME related thing I should mention is that, while speaking with AnEvilYak a few weeks ago, he noted that the automatic MIME sniffer on his system never runs when he has something like SETI running in the background all the time. He mentioned that it might be nice if we could implement a way around this, as he always has to manually identify files otherwise. -Tyler