Rahul wrote:
km wrote:
Lastly, "supposed to be good at performance" is another way people
lose their jobs by doing scratchy product evaluation. Have you
tested
it the performance yourself? Does it play nicely with all the other
device drivers you need?
yes, I had already worked with reiserfs version 3 (ofcourse i didnnot
recompile kernel) and the performance is quite good for small files as
against ext3.
Do you have any benchmarks available that shows reiserfs to perform
better than ext3 in RHEL 4?
Rahul
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, email ilugc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe
<password> <address>"
in the subject or body of the message.
http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
i would say that reiserfs is a ultimate failure ....... and not much
prefered by most of the modern distribution
only suse seems to stick on with that ...
--
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 23_50_4.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 13310 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/pipermail/ilugc/attachments/20060927/eb4ddbb6/23_50_4.gif
