Yeah. On 12/20/07, Kevin Jones <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > no push and release status then a number ye that's the way to go you > could do it with 1 finger > > > Shane D wrote: > > If you mean hit status once, release, and then press number, I like > > it. If you have to hold both, I would hate to do that if I bought one. > > > > On 12/20/07, CB <cnoc78@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> I agree. I truly like this idea. > >> > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "Kevin Jones" <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >> To: <icon-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2007 11:28 AM > >> Subject: [icon-discuss] Re: Suggestion for a future update. > >> > >> > >>> because this is much more efficient the hold-status key is only > efficient > >>> for the top item or 2 and actually status and a number is more efficient > >>> than even the top item in hold-status mode, both in key presses and in > >>> time. > >>> > >>> > >>> PAMELA RADER wrote: > >>>> Why not just use the Mocve Up or Down option and move the items around > on > >>>> that menu in the order you want them? > >>>> > >>>> Pamela Rader, TECHNICAL SUPPORT > >>>> American Printing House For The Blind > >>>> 1839 Frankfort Ave. > >>>> Louisville, KY 40206 > >>>> > >>>> PHONE: 1-800-223-1839, Ext. 307 > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>> kevin@xxxxxxxxxxx 12/20/07 12:16PM >>> > >>>> I would like a mode where you could say press status and a number and > it > >>>> would give you up to 12 using the star and number keys pieces of info. > >>>> Then you could press status 2 and it would tell you the time -- there > >>>> could be a way of selecting which pieces of status info you wanted per > >>>> program and you could move them around. Maybe pressing status 1 could > be > >>>> the same as now if you just press status, holding down status could > still > >>>> behave as it does now. If you really wanted more than 12 selections you > >>>> could make the number give you the second list then you could press > >>>> status number 3 or something. What do the rest of you think? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Irwin Hott wrote: > >>>>> I would like to see an easier way to get the time and an option for > the > >>>>> time to give seconds. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >> > >> > > > > > > -- -Shane Blog: http://blind-geek.com/blog/ CoOwner: http://sjtechzone.com AIM: inhaddict Skype: chatter8712