[openbeos] Re: Pe in SVN ?
- From: "Bruno Antunes" <sardaukar.siet@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:35:38 +0100
Precisely! (just adding to the vi/emacs flamewar here) :D
On Feb 13, 2008 5:31 PM, Andrew McCall <andrew.mccall@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 13/02/2008, François Revol <revol@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I still use BeIDE mostly over Pe because I didn't yet fix its azerty-
> > unfriendly shortcut handling. I checked it from cvs to have a look at
> > it recently.
> >
> > Fact is the cvs is hosted at BeUnited, which we don't know how long it
> > will last. Shouldn't we put this one in svn ?
> > src/apps or 3rdparty ? IIRC we agreed to have it as default IDE so it'd
> > be src/apps.
> >
> > Wait a minute, wasn't it XEmacs we chose ? :p
>
> Pah, XEmacs! vi is lightweight and fits with Haiku's goals.
>
> > François.
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
>
> Andrew McCall
> andrew.mccall@xxxxxxxxx
>
>
--
Bruno
---------------------------
Fidonet 2:5004/75.260
Other related posts:
