[openbeos] Re: Pe in SVN ?
- From: "Bruno Antunes" <sardaukar.siet@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:10:21 +0100
You need one of these to make emacs livable :D
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space-cadet_keyboard
On Feb 13, 2008 6:00 PM, viktor muntzing <viktor.muntzing@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> As both emacs and vi are from the 70'ies with all its limitations of that
> time we should use something more modern and practical :) You should save a
> file by pressing Ctrl-S like you do in all your other programs for instance
> :)
>
> *flame flame*
>
> 2008/2/13, Juan Sebastian Muñoz Arango <naruse@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
> > WTF? Emacs >>>>>>> vi*
> >
> > On Feb 13, 2008 11:35 AM, Bruno Antunes <sardaukar.siet@xxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Precisely! (just adding to the vi/emacs flamewar here) :D
> > >
> > >
> > > On Feb 13, 2008 5:31 PM, Andrew McCall <andrew.mccall@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 13/02/2008, François Revol <revol@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > I still use BeIDE mostly over Pe because I didn't yet fix its
> > > > azerty-
> > > > > unfriendly shortcut handling. I checked it from cvs to have a look
> > > > at
> > > > > it recently.
> > > > >
> > > > > Fact is the cvs is hosted at BeUnited, which we don't know how
> > > > long it
> > > > > will last. Shouldn't we put this one in svn ?
> > > > > src/apps or 3rdparty ? IIRC we agreed to have it as default IDE so
> > > > it'd
> > > > > be src/apps.
> > > > >
> > > > > Wait a minute, wasn't it XEmacs we chose ? :p
> > > >
> > > > Pah, XEmacs! vi is lightweight and fits with Haiku's goals.
> > > >
> > > > > François.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Andrew McCall
> > > > andrew.mccall@xxxxxxxxx
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Bruno
> > > ---------------------------
> > > Fidonet 2:5004/75.260
> >
> >
> >
>
--
Bruno
---------------------------
Fidonet 2:5004/75.260
Other related posts:
