[openbeos] Re: Pe in SVN ?
- From: "viktor muntzing" <viktor.muntzing@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:00:54 +0100
As both emacs and vi are from the 70'ies with all its limitations of that
time we should use something more modern and practical :) You should save a
file by pressing Ctrl-S like you do in all your other programs for instance
:)
*flame flame*
2008/2/13, Juan Sebastian Muñoz Arango <naruse@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
> WTF? Emacs >>>>>>> vi*
>
> On Feb 13, 2008 11:35 AM, Bruno Antunes <sardaukar.siet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Precisely! (just adding to the vi/emacs flamewar here) :D
> >
> >
> > On Feb 13, 2008 5:31 PM, Andrew McCall <andrew.mccall@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > On 13/02/2008, François Revol <revol@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > I still use BeIDE mostly over Pe because I didn't yet fix its
> > > azerty-
> > > > unfriendly shortcut handling. I checked it from cvs to have a look
> > > at
> > > > it recently.
> > > >
> > > > Fact is the cvs is hosted at BeUnited, which we don't know how long
> > > it
> > > > will last. Shouldn't we put this one in svn ?
> > > > src/apps or 3rdparty ? IIRC we agreed to have it as default IDE so
> > > it'd
> > > > be src/apps.
> > > >
> > > > Wait a minute, wasn't it XEmacs we chose ? :p
> > >
> > > Pah, XEmacs! vi is lightweight and fits with Haiku's goals.
> > >
> > > > François.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Andrew McCall
> > > andrew.mccall@xxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Bruno
> > ---------------------------
> > Fidonet 2:5004/75.260
>
>
>
Other related posts:
