> The downside however is that no matter how good port you make of it, > it > wont become a BeOS native app, and hence won't be using many of the > advanced features of the BeOS. That is, it wont be using the BeOS > mailing system, it wont be using translators for rendering images. It > wont be using add-ons the Be way. It wont be replicant-capable. It > wont > be using attributes in stored bookmarks. It won't store bookmarks in > a > folder. And so on. Actually, even Net+ doesn't use the Translators for rendering images - that's mainly because of the lack of a progressive rendering API (and perhaps the age of Net+) - you have to wait until the Translator is ready to see the image. Of course you are right, a Mozilla port couldn't be as integrated in BeOS as Net+ is, but it would be fine to have it. Adios... Axel.