[openbeos] Re: Incorrect File Sizes
- From: "Frank D. Engel, Jr." <fde101@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 07:13:36 -0800 (PST)
I doesn't wash cars either, so is that a bug too?
--- Scott MacMaster <zqxh@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> It makes sense that the file size doesn't include the size of the
> name of a
> file or other meta data that the file system adds. However, users
> add
> attributes to files. Attributes can become big. Users are concerned
> about
> disk space and how much they are using. Users (me, for example) want
> to
> know how much space their attributes use. Be doesn't display that
> information. It doesn't do something a user wants. Therefore it is
> a bug.
>
>
> Scott MacMaster
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bruno G. Albuquerque" <bga@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 4:50 AM
> Subject: [openbeos] Re: Incorrect File Sizes
>
>
> > On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Scott MacMaster wrote:
> >
> > > I just noticed that Be doesn't correctly calculate file sizes.
> I'm not
> sure
> > > of the details but I think the bug is probably in the BFS rather
> then
> > > tracker. I wonder if this has been dealt with in OpenBFS?
> > >
> > > The bug is simply, the size of attributes aren't added to the
> file size.
> >
> > It is not a bug. Attributes are metadata, not directly part of the
> file
> > data. For instance, no filesystem adds the size of the name o the
> file,
> > the permision bits and all other possible metadata to the size of
> the
> > file.
> >
> > -Bruno
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.423 / Virus Database: 238 - Release Date: 11/25/2002
>
>
=====
=======
Frank D. Engel, Jr.
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
Other related posts:
