Hi, 2010/1/7 Rene Gollent <anevilyak@xxxxxxxxx>: > On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Niels Reedijk <niels.reedijk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I disagree with that. As I feel these email aliases are given out to >> give contributors a trustworthy and official appearance for contacts >> with third parties (and explicitly not as a 'gift' to good >> contributors). I find that using real names looks more professional >> than nicknames. But hey, perhaps the ones that will be handed the >> email addresses will not care about professionalism. I don't have >> enough experience to judge on that. > > The counterpoint to that is that outsiders are most likely familiar > with e.g. the core developers via svn commits, in which case using the > same name as that used as svn username would make it more clear who > you're communicating with. Since email generally includes a separate > real name header anyways it seems somewhat redundant to force that > requirement on the username as well. Okay, I'm convinced that it is okay to use nicknames and in combination with the 'real name' during official correspondence. N>