Hi, On 2013-09-03 at 18:22:58 [+0200], Alexander von Gluck IV <kallisti5@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: [ ... ] > > It was mentioned that CD's are the same size and haven't changed much. While > this information is true, it really isn't a valid argument here. The > majority of the packages that would contain "excessive" development > resources wouldn't be on the installation CD. Just to give an overview of what we're talking about: ffmpeg_devel (4 MB) freetype_devel (1.5 MB) glu_devel (1.5 MB) libxml2_devel (1.5 MB) mesa_devel (5 MB) openssl_devel (3 MB) subversion (4.5 MB) Shown sizes are the ones of the hpkg files. I'm not saying that those wouldn't fit on the CD, but I don't consider these sizes negligible. [ ... ] > > This is generally where I've seen pain. If you've compiled more than a few > pieces of software under any RPM based distro you've seen this. The minute > you step outside of the source RPM box, you're left in a cycle of: > > - running ./configure > - install missing package X-devel > - running ./configure > - install missing package Y-devel > - running ./configure > - install missing package Z-devel > - etc > > Do that for more than a few source archives in a row and you will be in the > no-devel camp pretty quickly :-) Actually, with merged packages, it's not so unlikely that you'll be doing this instead: - running ./configure - install missing package X - running ./configure - install missing package Y - running ./configure - install missing package Z - etc Granted, maybe with fewer laps in general, but it's not as if all libraries required by the to-be-compiled software will just happen to already be installed on your system. cheers, Oliver