Stephan Assmus <superstippi@xxxxxx> wrote: > The live message and reply idea is much better than what I had in > mind. My > approach would have involved housekeeping, while your idea does not > need > it. Suppose an application like the MediaPlayer disables the > screensaver, > but then crashes before it has a chance to disable it again... the > service > that manages the events would have to keep track of which application > has > set which setting... your approach is much more robust. Nice! Well, robustness could be achieved with either method, just that it's inherent with Ryan's :-) Bye, Axel.