On Wednesday, September 10, 2014 at 9:36 AM, "Stephan Aßmus" <superstippi@xxxxxx> wrote: > The main site should really have an FAQ entry which goes into greater > detail. I think explaining why an obsolete arch (32-bit, gcc2!) is the recommended build is definitely useful. Because I don't get it. I honestly tried to get it, but I don't. The fact that it's a goal isn't very useful in itself. > If you really want to find out, try to google the discussions, there > have been plenty. If you know the background and reasoning and find it > not valid, you could start a new discussion directly addressing the > arguments made. But if you are not interested enough to research it, > then just stick to assuming the reasons are good. I did indeed do this, and it boiled down to the desire to have R5 binary compatibility. The actual rationale for that desire, however, is still elusive. Unless I missed something, in which case I apologize. Cheers m.a