on 6/18/03 10:24 AM, Steve Harris at S.W.Harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 09:47:27AM -0400, B.J. Buchalter wrote: >> We have not tested the modular synth type of graph, so I am not really >> speaking to that specific operation but I have tested things like IIR filter >> implementations where I can measure significant differences in noise floor >> structure and in listening tests that has a real impact on the sound (the 64 >> bit implementation is smoother and other weird subjective kind of words). So > > Yes, I'd agree with that entirely, but GMPI is not indended to support > blockless or recusive processing models, so that is a non issue. The > intermal procision can be whatever you like, its just the external i/o > were discussing here. I understand. Again, there are claims of the need. I am not sure that it is needed (by me), but I have seen signal processing chains that do need it (internally in our plugs), so I am not willing to dismiss it out of hand. There are systems today that currently implement wide I/O (Sonic Solutions, for example). Best regards, B.J. Buchalter Metric Halo M/S 601 - Building 8 Castle Point Campus Castle Point, NY 12511-0601 USA tel +1 845 831-8600 fax +1 603 250-2451 If you haven't heard ChannelStrip yet, you don't know what you're missing! Check out SpectraFoo, ChannelStrip and Mobile I/O at http://www.mhlabs.com/ Download a 12 day demo from <http://www.mhlabs.com/demo/> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not redistribute anyone else's words without their permission. Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe